Architecture of the In-Between 。之间建筑

The work of Core Design Workshop explores what may be called an architecture of the in-between, spaces that exist between interior and exterior, between old and new, between structure and void.

This sensibility emerges from the cultural and environmental conditions of Southeast Asia, where architecture is shaped by thresholds, courtyards, and interstitial spaces that mediate climate and daily life.

The following essay reflects on how this perspective developed.

Architecture of the In-Between
an essay by Chun Hooi, Tan


Soft-Boiled Eggs

Between Raw and Cooked
Notes on the Architecture of the In-Between

Growing up in Malaysia, soft-boiled eggs were something I ate without thinking much about.

At the neighbourhood coffeeshop, they would arrive in a small bowl, two eggs just set by hot water. A dash of soy sauce, a little white pepper, and a spoon to gently break the surface. Usually eaten with kaya toast and coffee, it was one of the simplest breakfasts imaginable.

For many years, it was just food.

Only much later did I realise that this humble dish quietly reflects something about the cultural condition of where we live.

The egg is neither fully raw nor fully cooked.

The white has begun to set but is not quite solid.

The yolk remains fluid but has already changed.

It exists somewhere in between.

In many Western cultures, eggs often appear runny or lightly cooked. In China, they are more commonly eaten fully boiled. Here in Malaysia and Singapore, however, the egg appears in another form, not raw, not fully cooked, but somewhere in between.

Soft-boiled.

The more I think about it, the more this small detail feels strangely familiar.

As Malaysian Chinese, many of us grow up in a similar cultural condition.

We carry traditions inherited from China, yet we are shaped by a multicultural Southeast Asian society. At the same time, our education, language, and professional training are often deeply influenced by Western systems.

Because of this, we rarely stand fully inside any one tradition.

We are never quite as natural in English as those who grew up in the West.

Nor can we claim to represent Chinese culture with the same authenticity as those who live in China or Taiwan.

So we often find ourselves somewhere in between.

Between East and West.

Between inherited traditions and contemporary life.

Between different ways of understanding the world.

For a long time, this position can feel uncertain, as if one is always slightly outside of things.

But over time, I began to realise that this condition also offers something else.

It creates distance.

Not the distance of detachment, but a subtle distance that allows one to observe.

When one stands completely inside a system, many assumptions become invisible. They are simply accepted as normal. But when one stands too far outside, understanding becomes superficial.

Somewhere in between, however, relationships begin to appear more clearly.

It is a bit like standing in front of a painting.

Too close, and all you see are fragments of colour and brushstrokes. Too far away, and the image loses its detail. But at a certain distance, the composition begins to reveal itself.

This in-between position allows a similar clarity.

It allows one to participate in a culture while still observing it.

Over time, this way of seeing began to shape the way I think about architecture.

In architectural education, we are often trained to focus on buildings themselves – form, structure, materials, composition. But through practice, I gradually realised that some of the most meaningful architectural experiences happen not in the objects themselves, but in the spaces between them.

Thresholds.

Corridors.

Courtyards.

Shadows.

Pauses.

These spaces are rarely the centre of attention, yet they quietly determine how we move, see, and feel within a place.

They exist between states.

Between inside and outside.

Between old and new.

Between structure and void.

Between movement and stillness.

In many ways, architecture reveals itself most clearly through these relationships.

Living in Southeast Asia makes this even more apparent.

The tropical climate rarely encourages completely sealed buildings. Heat, humidity, rain, and vegetation constantly approach the boundaries of architecture. As a result, many buildings in this region develop spaces that mediate between interior and exterior.

Verandas.

Courtyards.

Five-foot ways.

Covered walkways.

These spaces are neither fully inside nor fully outside. They allow air to move, light to filter, and people to transition gradually between different environments.

Space here is rarely divided abruptly.

Interior slowly becomes exterior.

Public gradually shifts into private.

Architecture blends into landscape.

In this sense, the in-between is not an exception in Southeast Asia, it is often the natural condition of space.

In my own work, I find myself returning to these questions repeatedly.

Projects such as Introverse House, Interface House, Interstice House, and Inliminal House each explore different forms of interstitial space. In these projects, the most interesting moments are often not the rooms themselves, but the spaces that connect them.

The pause before entering a room.

A courtyard separating yet linking two structures.

A threshold where interior gradually dissolves into exterior.

These moments resist simple definition.

They belong somewhere in between.

Perhaps because of this, I sometimes return to the image of the soft-boiled egg.

Like that egg, architecture does not always need to resolve into a single, fixed state. Some of the most interesting conditions exist when different forces remain in balance.

Not fully one thing.

Not fully another.

Within that ambiguity, new possibilities begin to appear.

Architecture, perhaps, is most meaningful when it operates within these intermediate territories – between shelter and landscape, between enclosure and openness, between permanence and the changing rhythms of daily life.

In such spaces, architecture becomes less about objects and more about relationships.

It mediates between people and climate, between memory and the present, between cultures and environments.

My own work is simply an ongoing attempt to explore these relationships – observing how different conditions meet, adjusting their balance, and allowing dialogue to emerge through space.

And often, it is in those quiet moments of transition – in the spaces that sit between things – that architecture truly begins to happen.

Related Projects

• Introverse House

• Interface House

• Interstice House

• Inliminal House

之间建筑

Core Design Workshop 的实践,一直在探索一种我称之为「之间建筑」(Architecture of the In-Between)的空间状态 – 一种存在于内与外、旧与新、结构与虚之间的建筑。

这种空间意识,并不是刻意建立的理论,而是来自东南亚的文化与环境条件。在这里,建筑往往通过门廊、庭院与各种过渡空间,与气候和日常生活发生关系。

这篇文章,尝试回顾这种思考是如何逐渐形成的。

生熟蛋
关于「之间建筑」的一些思考
– 陈炯晖

在马来西亚长大,生熟蛋是一种再普通不过的早餐。

小时候在茶餐室里吃它,从来没有多想。一个小碗,两颗刚烫好的鸡蛋,滴一点酱油,撒一点白胡椒,用汤匙轻轻搅开。通常配上咖椰吐司和一杯咖啡,就是一天的开始。

很多年以后,我才慢慢意识到,这样一道简单的食物,其实很像我们所处的文化状态。

鸡蛋既不是完全生的,也不是完全熟的。蛋白刚刚凝结,却还没有真正变成固体;蛋黄依然流动,但也已经不再是原来的状态。它处在一种微妙的状态之间。

生与熟之间。

在西方,鸡蛋常常以半流动的方式出现,例如溏心蛋或荷包蛋;在中国,更多时候则是完全煮熟的水煮蛋。而在马来西亚与新加坡,我们却习惯吃一种介于两者之间的形式 – 生熟蛋。

这种状态,总让我觉得有点像我们这一代马来西亚华人的文化位置。

作为在马来西亚出生长大的华人,我们既承载着来自中国的文化传统,也深深生活在一个多元文化的社会里。同时,我们又不断受到西方教育、语言与现代生活方式的影响。

很多时候,我们很难完全属于任何一种单一的文化。

我们既不像西方人那样自然地使用英语,也不可能比来自中国或台湾的人更纯粹地表达所谓的东方文化。

于是,我们常常处在一种「之间」的状态。

在东方与西方之间。

在传统与现代之间。

在本土经验与外来文化之间。

这种位置有时会让人产生一种不确定感。但随着时间推移,我逐渐意识到,这样的状态其实也带来一种特别的视角。

当一个人不完全处在任何一端的时候,他往往会自然地与环境保持一种距离。

这种距离既不是完全抽离,也不是完全沉浸,而是一种介于两者之间的观察位置。正因为如此,很多关系反而变得更加清晰。

有点像看一幅画。

如果站得太近,只看到零碎的颜色与笔触;如果站得太远,画面又变得模糊。只有在某个适当的距离,整体的构图才会慢慢浮现。

这种「之间的位置」,让我开始重新思考建筑。

在建筑教育里,我们经常被训练去关注建筑本身 – 形式、结构、立面、材料。但随着实践的积累,我越来越意识到,建筑真正有意思的地方,往往不在建筑物本身,而是在它们之间。

那些不太容易被定义的空间。

门槛。

走廊。

庭院。

阴影。

停顿。

这些空间往往不是主角,却悄悄决定了我们如何体验一个地方。

它们存在于不同状态之间。

室内与室外之间。

旧建筑与新建筑之间。

结构与空隙之间。

行动与停留之间。

某种意义上,建筑的力量并不来自物体本身,而来自这些关系。

生活在东南亚,这种感觉尤其明显。

热带气候很少鼓励完全封闭的建筑。炎热、潮湿、雨水与植物不断靠近建筑的边界,因此这里的建筑很自然地发展出各种过渡空间。

门廊、庭院、五脚基、有盖走道。

这些空间既不是完全的室内,也不是完全的室外。它们让空气流动,让光线进入,也让人们在不同状态之间慢慢过渡。

空间不是被截然分开,而是层层展开。

室内慢慢变成室外。

公共逐渐过渡为私密。

建筑逐渐融入环境。

在这样的环境里,「之间」反而成为一种非常自然的空间状态。

在我的实践中,我也不断回到这种空间问题。像 Introverse House、Interface House、Interstice House 与 Inliminal House 等项目,其实都在尝试探索这些「之间空间」。在这些作品里,最有意思的往往不是房间本身,而是那些难以被清楚命名的地方。

进入空间前的一瞬停顿。

分隔两座建筑却又连接它们的庭院。

室内慢慢变成室外的门槛。

这些空间并不属于任何单一状态,却正是在这样的模糊之中,建筑开始产生对话。

也许正因为如此,我后来的一些住宅项目,都不约而同地围绕着类似的问题展开。从 Introverse、Interface、Interstice 到 Inliminal,这些名字都带着一种「之间」的意味。它们并不是刻意形成的系列,而是在不同的项目与情境中反复出现的同一个空间问题 – 建筑如何在不同条件之间建立关系。

回到最初的生熟蛋,我有时会觉得建筑也有类似的状态。

它不一定要是完全确定的形式,也不一定要被清楚地定义。

有时候,最丰富的状态正是在不同条件之间的平衡之中。

就像那颗鸡蛋,既不是完全生的,也不是完全熟的。

在这种看似不确定的状态里,反而出现了另一种可能。

或许,建筑最有意义的时候,正是在这些中间地带。

在庇护与自然之间。

在封闭与开放之间。

在结构的稳定与日常生活的流动之间。

在这些空间里,建筑不仅仅是容纳活动的容器,它更像是一种媒介 – 在不同的人、文化与环境之间建立关系。

而我的工作,也许只是不断尝试去理解这些关系。

去观察。

去调整。

让不同的条件在空间中产生对话。

在那些看似安静的过渡与停顿之中,建筑往往才真正开始发生。

相关项目

• Introverse House – 内境

• Interface House – 界面

• Interstice House – 隙间

• Inliminal House – 阈限